There's a particular quality to the light over the Malé waters in late afternoon, when the sun hangs low and the sea appears as polished glass. From the harbor wall, watching the dhoni boats glide by, everything seems perfect, untouchable in its serenity. But any fisherman will tell you—the surface reveals little of the currents moving beneath.
This morning, watching a group of tourists marvel at the perfect turquoise from their speedboat, I thought about that word: untouchable. How we apply it to things that appear flawless, protected, beyond reproach. The resorts that dot our atolls present this same flawless face—pristine beaches, impeccable service, a world removed from the realities just beyond their carefully managed boundaries.
Yet beneath this surface, like those hidden ocean currents, move complex systems of supply and demand, of economic pressures and human needs. The same waters that carry luxury yachts also bear the fishing dhonis of local fishermen struggling with rising fuel costs. The same beaches that host wealthy tourists also witness the quiet struggles of island communities facing housing shortages and limited opportunities.
When we declare something untouchable, we often mean we prefer not to examine it too closely. We want to preserve the illusion of perfection, the comforting notion that some things remain pure and uncompromised. But reality, like the ocean, is rarely so simple. The most beautiful coral reefs hide the most complex ecosystems, and what appears static from a distance is actually in constant, dynamic negotiation with its environment.
Perhaps the question isn't whether something is truly untouchable, but why we need it to be. What comfort do we find in maintaining these illusions, and what truths might we discover if we dared to look beneath the surface?
— Source fragments: id rather it be untouchable but how does this make it a scam?